Security testing hasn’t just fallen behind—it’s playing the wrong game in a world where product teams ship updates like software streams, testing once a year is akin to locking the doors after the party has ended. It’s not just late; it’s irrelevant.
Most orgs still treat pentests like performance reviews: formal, infrequent, and disconnected from the day-to-day reality. But risk doesn’t work on an annual schedule. It spikes with every deploy, API change, or third-party integration, none of which wait for Q4.
The shift isn’t about “doing more testing” but about making penetration testing frequency native to your development process. Embedded, continuous, responsive, as a control loop. That’s what separates the teams who hope they’re secure from the ones who know.
Why Astra is the best in pentesting?
- We’re the only company that combines automated & manual pentest to create a one-of-a-kind pentest platform.
- Vetted scans ensure zero false positives.
- Our intelligent vulnerability scanner emulates hacker behavior & evolves with every pentest.
- Astra’s scanner helps you shift left by integrating with your CI/CD.
- Our platform helps you uncover, manage & fix vulnerabilities in one place.
- Trusted by the brands you trust like Agora, Spicejet, Muthoot, Dream11, etc.
The Real Risk of Once-a-Year Security
Compliance is inherently backward-looking. Simply put, compliance frameworks are not designed to detect emerging threats—they’re designed to assess whether known controls were implemented correctly. It’s a snapshot of what was true at a point in time, not what is or will be.
And while PCI DSS penetration testing frequency, among other factors, plays a role in establishing foundational practices, it does little to ensure that those practices keep pace with modern adversaries. Auditors move on documentation; attackers move on opportunity.
To shift from a reactive to a resilient approach, organizations need to break the cycle. Here’s how:
- Reframe compliance as a byproduct, not the goal. Security teams should aim to build sustainable, real-time detection and response capabilities. If your environment is resilient, compliance will follow, not the other way around.
- Shorten the feedback loop. Annual tests offer stale data. Integrate continuous control validation (CCV), attack simulation, and real-time telemetry to understand how controls perform under pressure today, not twelve months ago.
- Measure against real-world threats, not just frameworks. The MITRE ATT&CK framework and threat intel should be as embedded in your testing culture as your ISO 27001 checklist. The adversary doesn’t care if your controls passed an audit—they care if they work.
- Tie security metrics to operational risk, not audit milestones. What’s your current time to detect? How often are your most critical alerts reviewed? These metrics surface real posture, not audit-driven optics.
Product Velocity vs. Testing Cadence: The Drift Dilemma
Modern engineering is built for speed; security testing isn’t. With CI/CD pipelines, feature flags, and infrastructure-as-code, production environments evolve daily, often on an hourly basis. Every deploy reshapes the attack surface. Yet most security testing still runs on a fixed, infrequent schedule—monthly scans, quarterly reviews, annual pentests.
This mismatch in the frequency of penetration testing is what we call security drift—the gradual divergence between what is tested and what is live. The faster you ship, the quicker your controls fall out of sync with reality.
It’s like testing a rocket’s parachutes after it’s already launched. Too late, too slow, and disconnected from where the risk is. Here’s how that drift plays out in practice:
- IaC changes go unreviewed. A misconfigured security group in a Terraform template might not get caught until after it’s exposed—if ever.
- Feature flags create latent risk. A feature may pass testing when off but expose vulnerabilities when toggled on in production.
- Third-party updates introduce new behaviors. Patches, APIs, or integrations change beneath the surface, altering system behavior without triggering fresh reviews.
The core issue is that testing cadence is often tied to release cycles, rather than threat exposure. But attackers aren’t waiting for your following sprint review—they’re probing every change as it ships.
Stop Scheduling Security
Security testing is often scheduled like a meeting—same time every month, regardless of what has changed or where the actual risk lies. However, in practice, uniform cadences create blind spots and result in wasted effort. Some systems demand constant attention. Others don’t. Treating them the same is inefficient at best, negligent at worst.
The smarter approach is to match penetration testing frequency to the system’s exposure, importance, and rate of change.
- Customer-facing systems—such as authentication, payment flows, and any systems that handle sensitive user data—require high-frequency, high-fidelity testing. These are prime targets, as they evolve constantly and carry the highest impact if breached.
- Internal tools—such as reporting dashboards or back-office admin panels—may not require the same level of intensity. With tighter access controls and lower external exposure, less frequent testing can still maintain safety without over-engineering the process.
- Regulated systems (PCI, HIPAA, SOX) add another dimension. Here, risk is both operational and legal. Even if a system doesn’t change often, its baseline for testing has to remain high to satisfy external requirements.
The reality is that some surfaces are hot zones—constantly shifting and always exposed. Others are more static, lower risk. Testing should scale accordingly. The more a system changes, the more it is exposed, and the more critical it becomes to the business, the tighter its security loop needs to be.
Aligning Pentest Frequency with Risk Appetite & Business Objectives
Risk appetite sets the baseline. Some industries have no margin for error. If you’re handling financial transactions, patient data, or critical infrastructure, low risk tolerance demands tight testing cycles. It’s not about “best practice”—it’s about existential risk. The impact of a missed vulnerability isn’t hypothetical; it’s revenue loss, reputational damage, or regulatory fines.
On the other hand, early-stage startups or internal-only platforms may be more willing to tolerate risk, at least in the short term. They can afford longer intervals between tests, provided they understand what they are trading off: slower detection, less coverage, and increased potential exposure.
Business objectives fine-tune the cadence. Where the company is going, and how fast, matters just as much as what it does.
Pentest Cadence as a Sales Enabler
Buyers, especially those in regulated or security-conscious industries, want more than feature demos and uptime guarantees. They want proof you can be trusted, which often begins with a simple question: “When was your last penetration test?”
If the answer is dated or vague, it raises red flags. A stale report signals a stale security posture—or worse, a reactive mindset. However, if you can provide a recent, comprehensive test, you can immediately reduce friction. Procurement moves faster. Security reviews shrink. Trust builds quicker.
Frequent, fresh pentests don’t just satisfy auditors—they enable sales.
- They show you’re proactive. You’re not just reacting to compliance timelines; you’re building a program that anticipates risk.
- They preempt buyer objections. When the security questionnaire arrives, you’re ready, with artifacts that demonstrate maturity, not minimalism.
- They accelerate deal velocity. Especially in the enterprise and mid-market sectors, a strong security posture can be the difference between months of back-and-forth and a signed contract.
Testing cadence isn’t just about defense—it’s part of go-to-market readiness. Simply put, if your competitors are running annual tests and you’re shipping clean quarterly reports, you’ve just turned your security program into a differentiator.
Make your SaaS Platform the safest place on the Internet.
With our detailed and specially
curated SaaS security checklist.
Red Team vs. Pentest vs. PTaaS — What to Use, When
Red teaming, penetration testing (pentesting), and PTaaS are often grouped together under the “offensive testing” label, but they serve distinct purposes. The mistake many organizations make is treating them as interchangeable, when in reality, they answer different questions, operate on different timelines, and deliver various kinds of value.
So the real question isn’t ‘How often should we test?’ It’s: ‘What are we trying to learn—and how fast do we need that feedback?’ Here’s a side-by-side view to clarify when each approach makes sense:
| Features | Red Team | Traditional Pentest | PTaaS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | Emulate real-world threat actors | Identify known vulnerabilities across broad scope | Continuous validation and fast retesting |
| Typical Frequency | 1–2 times per year | Quarterly to annually | Ongoing / per release |
| Best For | Testing detection, response, resilience | Compliance, surface validation | Fast-changing environments, rapid feedback loops |
| ROI Profile | Strategic insight, long-tail payoff | Moderate insight, compliance coverage | High agility, high iteration value |
Red teams are surgical. Use them when you want to understand how your defenders hold up against real tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs)—and how fast you can respond.
Traditional pentests are broad and periodic. They’re effective at identifying common misconfigurations and vulnerabilities across your external surface but struggle to keep up with fast-moving environments.
PTaaS is built for speed. When code is shipping weekly and features are gated behind flags, you need a testing model that matches that rhythm—something continuous, responsive, and integrated into the pipeline.
That’s why the method of testing should never be confused with its frequency. Red teaming weekly would be overkill. Pentesting quarterly on a fast-changing product leaves you blind. PTaaS isn’t a replacement—it’s an evolution for environments where pace matters as much as precision.
Compliance and Penetration Testing
| Compliance | Industries / Who Must Comply | Penetration Testing Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | SaaS companies, tech providers, and cloud-based service providers | At least annually or after major system changes |
| GDPR | Any organization handling personal data of EU residents (globally applicable) | Not strictly mandated, but regular testing is recommended as part of ongoing risk assessments |
| HIPAA | Healthcare providers, insurers, and business associates | Annual or as needed, based on risk assessments |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | All industries seeking international standardization in InfoSec | At least annually, and during certification or surveillance audits |
| PCI DSS | Any entity processing, storing, or transmitting credit card data (retail, fintech, e-commerce) | At least annually, and after any significant infrastructure or app change |
| FedRAMP | Cloud service providers working with U.S. federal agencies | At least annually, it requires ongoing vulnerability scans and monthly reporting |
| NIST Cybersecurity Framework | U.S. critical infrastructure, government contractors, and voluntary adopters (cross-industry) | Not mandatory, but annual testing is considered best practice |
| SOX | Publicly traded companies in the U.S. | Not explicitly mandated, but annual IT control audits often include pentests |
Beyond Point-in-Time: A Continuous Testing Mindset
Traditional pentesting is static by design—book it, scope it, wait weeks, then read the PDF. By the time the report is released, the code has changed, features have shipped, and the findings may already be outdated. In modern product environments, that lag isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky.
Enter Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS): a model built for speed, iteration, and integration.
PTaaS shifts testing from a one-off event to an ongoing capability:
- Retesting is on demand. When fixes go live, validation doesn’t have to wait for the next engagement. Teams can retest immediately, tightening feedback loops and reducing exposure windows.
- It integrates directly into the SDLC. Security isn’t bolted on at the end; it becomes part of the build-ship-verify cycle. Developers can engage with findings in real time, not months after the fact.
- Reporting is continuous. Instead of static PDFs, teams and stakeholders get live dashboards—up-to-date, accessible, and always audit-ready.
This shift does more than improve operational tempo. It unlocks adaptive frequency—a testing cadence that flexes with how you ship and how your customers interact with your product—shipping weekly? Test weekly. Launching a new region? Spin up a fresh test aligned to that rollout.
How to Justify More Frequent Pentesting to the Board or CFO
Let’s be blunt: asking for more frequent pentesting without reframing the conversation is a losing battle. Most boards and CFOs don’t care how often you test; they care why it matters to the business. And unless you speak their language, “more security” just sounds like “more spend.”
But here’s the shift: Pentest frequency isn’t a technical decision—it’s a strategic signal. It demonstrates how seriously you take the risks associated with revenue, reputation, and operational resilience.
Security leaders who win these conversations don’t ask for budget—they make the business case:
- “This reduces exposure on systems that generate 80% of our revenue.”
- “This removes blockers from enterprise sales cycles.”
- “This converts unpredictable risk into a predictable operating expense.”
More frequent testing isn’t about paranoia but precision. You’re not testing everything all the time. You’re tuning your cadence to match where your risk lives and how fast your business moves. That’s not overhead; it’s risk-aligned investment.
How Can Astra Help?
Astra makes frequent, continuous security testing not just possible, but practical. With PTaaS at its core, we combine deep manual expertise with automation to deliver real-time, on-demand penetration testing that keeps pace with modern development cycles.
Whether you’re deploying weekly or daily, our team ensures that your security posture stays aligned with every code push, config change, or product update.
What sets our platform apart is how it simplifies high-frequency testing, featuring over 10,000 constantly evolving test cases, zero false positives, seamless CI/CD integrations, and developer-ready reporting. You don’t just get coverage—you get context.
With penetration testing frequency best practices, security shifts left, risk visibility shifts right, and your team gains the speed and assurance to scale safely, without sacrificing velocity.
Final Thoughts
Penetration testing frequency isn’t a number on a calendar; it’s a signal of how your organization handles change, risk, and trust. Static, annual models were built for a different era, when deployments were rare and infrastructure was stable. However, today, product teams ship weekly, risks shift daily, and customer expectations regarding security have never been higher.
That’s why forward-looking teams are moving beyond point-in-time tests to adopt flexible, continuous testing models that mirror their development, deployment, and scaling processes. Whether driven by compliance, GTM velocity, or scrutiny from enterprise buyers, frequent testing is now part of the trust equation.
FAQs
How often do companies do penetration testing?
Companies typically conduct penetration testing annually or semi-annually, but frequency can vary based on industry regulations, risk tolerance, and infrastructure changes. High-risk sectors or rapidly evolving systems may test quarterly or continuously.
What is the standard penetration test interval?
The standard penetration test interval is typically once or twice a year, depending on your industry, compliance needs, and risk profile. However, with constantly evolving threats, many organizations now prefer continuous pentesting to detect vulnerabilities faster and maintain stronger, real-time security posture.
What are the 5 phases of pentesting?
The five phases of pentesting are reconnaissance, scanning, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting. Each phase builds upon the last to identify vulnerabilities, exploit them safely, assess impact, and deliver clear, actionable insights to improve overall security.
